<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kate Walsh&#8217;s new boobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/</link>
	<description>we have the best of the worst celebrity plastic surgery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:14:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: melony</title>
		<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/comment-page-2/#comment-16712</link>
		<dc:creator>melony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/?p=1959#comment-16712</guid>
		<description>Same tits, different woman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same tits, different woman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeeplySuperficial</title>
		<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/comment-page-2/#comment-14855</link>
		<dc:creator>DeeplySuperficial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/?p=1959#comment-14855</guid>
		<description>Thor, an emaciated frame would not ever have a 42DD breast because the number has nothing to do with cupsize, but the measurement of the chest under the tittays.

So it would be more relatable to say maybe 32DDD. Which also, yes, is not hot.

C&#039;mon. Kate Walsh isn&#039;t in her 20s. Give her titties some friggin&#039; slack. They&#039;re gonna be kinda lumpy and weird looking in something too tight over that area. It&#039;s part of what sagging skin does. Take a look at those pictures of Jewel and her smashed boobies.

Bleck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thor, an emaciated frame would not ever have a 42DD breast because the number has nothing to do with cupsize, but the measurement of the chest under the tittays.</p>
<p>So it would be more relatable to say maybe 32DDD. Which also, yes, is not hot.</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon. Kate Walsh isn&#8217;t in her 20s. Give her titties some friggin&#8217; slack. They&#8217;re gonna be kinda lumpy and weird looking in something too tight over that area. It&#8217;s part of what sagging skin does. Take a look at those pictures of Jewel and her smashed boobies.</p>
<p>Bleck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizzy</title>
		<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/comment-page-2/#comment-14450</link>
		<dc:creator>lizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/?p=1959#comment-14450</guid>
		<description>Ditto Sarah - tops like that first one are complete boob-killlers and squishing them up gives her a cleavage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto Sarah &#8211; tops like that first one are complete boob-killlers and squishing them up gives her a cleavage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somuchstupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/comment-page-2/#comment-13659</link>
		<dc:creator>somuchstupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/?p=1959#comment-13659</guid>
		<description>thanks thor. it&#039;s nice to see that there are some americans with good taste too!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks thor. it&#8217;s nice to see that there are some americans with good taste too!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ja</title>
		<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/comment-page-2/#comment-13638</link>
		<dc:creator>ja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/?p=1959#comment-13638</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t look like a boob job to me. Looks like those chicken cutlet bras that are squishing her boobs up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t look like a boob job to me. Looks like those chicken cutlet bras that are squishing her boobs up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/comment-page-2/#comment-13527</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/?p=1959#comment-13527</guid>
		<description>This woman has not had implants. She&#039;s using Hollywood&#039;s tricks to make her cleavage look bigger. The least you could do is compare two picture where she is wearing similar outfits. The second outfit it obviously more constricting and, therefore, providing her with cleavage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This woman has not had implants. She&#8217;s using Hollywood&#8217;s tricks to make her cleavage look bigger. The least you could do is compare two picture where she is wearing similar outfits. The second outfit it obviously more constricting and, therefore, providing her with cleavage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'Mela</title>
		<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/comment-page-2/#comment-13407</link>
		<dc:creator>'Mela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/?p=1959#comment-13407</guid>
		<description>Her dress in pic #2 looks to be constricting breathing, as well as pushing her up and out!
I loved her red hair. It was so elegant. Bring it back, go up a size, and we&#039;re good here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her dress in pic #2 looks to be constricting breathing, as well as pushing her up and out!<br />
I loved her red hair. It was so elegant. Bring it back, go up a size, and we&#8217;re good here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor</title>
		<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/comment-page-2/#comment-13400</link>
		<dc:creator>Thor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/?p=1959#comment-13400</guid>
		<description>MEMO TO AMERICAN WOMEN (some of these comments concern Kate Walsh, whoever she is):

1.  Trout mouth is not &quot;hot.&quot;

2.  An emaciated female frame is not &quot;hot.&quot;  The willpower, denial, neuroses, and obsessions that compel a woman to become emaciated, and maintain her emaciated frame, are not &quot;sexy.&quot;  If you are emaciated, I am confident you are an annoying high-maintenance head case who has bought into some gay male fashion designer&#039;s fantasies concerning young men.  You would not be a fun date.

3.  An emaciated female frame with a 42DD fake rack is not &quot;sexy.&quot;  Such a female has bought into a gay male fashion designer&#039;s fantasies concerning young men and combined it with what she believes is a heterosexual male&#039;s porn star fantasy.  This female looks ridiculous and asymmetrical.  She is not &quot;hot.&quot;  I am confident she is also an annoying head case.

4.  Intelligence is sexy.  A sense of humor is sexy.  Flirtation is sexy.  Physical attractiveness, natural curves, and comfort with yourself are sexy.  

Please stop buying into the American death culture&#039;s vision concerning what&#039;s allegedly &quot;hot.&quot;

Signed,

A generally appalled American male</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MEMO TO AMERICAN WOMEN (some of these comments concern Kate Walsh, whoever she is):</p>
<p>1.  Trout mouth is not &#8220;hot.&#8221;</p>
<p>2.  An emaciated female frame is not &#8220;hot.&#8221;  The willpower, denial, neuroses, and obsessions that compel a woman to become emaciated, and maintain her emaciated frame, are not &#8220;sexy.&#8221;  If you are emaciated, I am confident you are an annoying high-maintenance head case who has bought into some gay male fashion designer&#8217;s fantasies concerning young men.  You would not be a fun date.</p>
<p>3.  An emaciated female frame with a 42DD fake rack is not &#8220;sexy.&#8221;  Such a female has bought into a gay male fashion designer&#8217;s fantasies concerning young men and combined it with what she believes is a heterosexual male&#8217;s porn star fantasy.  This female looks ridiculous and asymmetrical.  She is not &#8220;hot.&#8221;  I am confident she is also an annoying head case.</p>
<p>4.  Intelligence is sexy.  A sense of humor is sexy.  Flirtation is sexy.  Physical attractiveness, natural curves, and comfort with yourself are sexy.  </p>
<p>Please stop buying into the American death culture&#8217;s vision concerning what&#8217;s allegedly &#8220;hot.&#8221;</p>
<p>Signed,</p>
<p>A generally appalled American male</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's time, Kate!</title>
		<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/comment-page-2/#comment-13392</link>
		<dc:creator>It's time, Kate!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/?p=1959#comment-13392</guid>
		<description>When, oh when is she going to come OUT OF THE CLOSET already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When, oh when is she going to come OUT OF THE CLOSET already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GiveMeABreak</title>
		<link>http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/2010/01/01/kate-walshs-new-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-13382</link>
		<dc:creator>GiveMeABreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/?p=1959#comment-13382</guid>
		<description>For those who don&#039;t know her she is the hot red head in the Cadilac commercials.  She changes her looks often but does look better as a red head.  This was a weak attempt a taking a cheap shot at her.  You are loosing credibility quickly.  Not all plastic surgery is bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who don&#8217;t know her she is the hot red head in the Cadilac commercials.  She changes her looks often but does look better as a red head.  This was a weak attempt a taking a cheap shot at her.  You are loosing credibility quickly.  Not all plastic surgery is bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
