Comment by Lamb — January 1, 2010 at 9:33 am

No bra Vs. push up bra….cmon!

Comment by Q — January 1, 2010 at 10:05 am

The second dress doesn’t look like she’d be able to wear a pushup bra either, unless she planned on wearing that jacket all night.

Comment by Sally — January 1, 2010 at 11:25 am

If you look closer, you’ll see that the top of her dress is very tight, which consequently squishes her breasts together, up, and out, making them appear fuller.

Comment by Venus In Blue Jeans — January 1, 2010 at 11:35 am

She looks like she is enhancing her chest via a push up method. Her cleavage is on the small and tasteful side, and I see no boob job tell-tale signs. What I see is a weight loss that is taking its toll on her face by causing increased lines in her cheeks. Also, I do not like jet black hair on any woman, unless its natural. It is just as ageing as that horrid platinum or bright yellow blond color. You can have very dark dyed hair but that jet black really looks stark.

Comment by LaLa — January 1, 2010 at 12:22 pm

I agree either the top has boning like a corset or she’s using something to push her breasts up. I agree with Venus about the hair color the black and plat. blonde are harsh colors on most people

Comment by Joan — January 1, 2010 at 1:11 pm

Another actress who no longer looks like herself. She looks to have had something done to her face. Her eyes are squinty. Why, oh why did she mess herself up. She looked so much better than before. Don’t care for the dark hair on her. She was gorgeous as a redhead (and as a blond when she was on the Drew Carey show). Her left breast seems a bit lumpy. Maybe a boob job, or just a too tight bustier squishing her. Ladies, please wear clothes that fit. Too tight is not flattering.

Comment by MG — January 1, 2010 at 1:19 pm

Doesn’t look like a boob job to me.

Comment by anony — January 1, 2010 at 1:33 pm

She looks better on the left. Maybe her new girlfriend likes bigger looking boobs.

Comment by Lola Granola — January 1, 2010 at 4:09 pm

Is that even the same woman? (squints, blinks)

Comment by Bunnie — January 1, 2010 at 7:19 pm

I am with Lola.. are we sure that is the same woman? And if it is.. She should lost the black hair and clothes pronto. The black top makes her torso look unusually thick, while shoving her poor breasts into a painful pinch trying to fit into (yet another) too small top for the body.

Clothes that fit, does not mean ’skin tight’. THe only people that look good in skin tight clothes are those that have no excess body fat what so ever.

Please people.. when you decide to wear something skin tight.. go to http://www.peopleofwalmart.com first. That will be enough to give a sane person pause.

Comment by Q — January 1, 2010 at 9:07 pm

OTOH, looking at the photo again.. her nose looks different, like she’s had it thinned out. Doesn’t match her face too well imo

Comment by Brooke — January 1, 2010 at 9:38 pm

Push-up bra, all the way. But is this seriously the same woman??? If I hadn’t been told it was the same Kate Walsh (who?), I would have thought they were two different people.

Comment by Venus In Blue Jeans — January 2, 2010 at 12:34 am

It’s the same woman. A drastic hair color change and style changed coupled with weight loss is what you are seeing. the nose has not been altered. She’s just older and her hair is jet black and greasy and her clothes are tasteless.

Comment by le — January 2, 2010 at 3:16 am

weird lumpy cleavage..but seems like a really tight push up bra.. looks painful. And her tan is gone which IMO is better. I dont’ see a change in facial features

Comment by mr.ed — January 2, 2010 at 6:11 am

I agree with the above posts. She’s table grade.

Comment by CK — January 2, 2010 at 7:43 am

She looked better in the before photo.

Comment by Jess — January 2, 2010 at 11:55 am

Other than changing her hair and losing the tan I don’t think she looks different at all. She’s smiling very wide in the second picture which is going change her face shape a bit, but I don’t think she’s had any work done. And those aren’t implants…her top is a corset which often pushes boobs into a strange position, especially if they’re small to begin with.

Comment by Sher — January 2, 2010 at 9:20 pm

She has no fullness on the lower part of the breast. I think she gathered up what she has and they were lifted in this outfit.
I think this is one case where you are mistaken.
She’s beautiful. I think it’s horrible when others hide behind their computer and say things about another person that is unkind and unnecessary.

Comment by amanda — January 2, 2010 at 9:29 pm

the top is too small and my guess is that she pulled her boobs up for more cleavage.
she is a stunning red head, the dark hair isnt my fave but shes still cute

Comment by Madeline — January 3, 2010 at 1:20 am

She changes her look a lot. The After picture was taken at last year’s VS Super Bowl Party; it is an 11 month old picture. Anyone who’s seen her since then (like September’s Emmy Awards) knows this was just a phase, it’s over, been over for a LONG time, and her tits are still the same as ever.

Comment by WarpedRecord — January 3, 2010 at 1:32 pm

Who’s Kate Walsh?

Comment by Jake — January 3, 2010 at 7:52 pm

I don’t know who she is but she looks a lot better as a redhead…she is not a brunette, but maybe that gay female Hispanic lady rubbed off on her.

Comment by Linny — January 4, 2010 at 4:11 am

Looks more like she’s wearing a push up bra. Don’t like the new haircolor.

Comment by Karen — January 4, 2010 at 4:41 am

She looks awful in the 2nd pic! She just doesn’t look as good as she did in the 1st one!

Comment by GiveMeABreak — January 4, 2010 at 8:21 am

For those who don’t know her she is the hot red head in the Cadilac commercials. She changes her looks often but does look better as a red head. This was a weak attempt a taking a cheap shot at her. You are loosing credibility quickly. Not all plastic surgery is bad.

Comment by It's time, Kate! — January 4, 2010 at 2:06 pm

When, oh when is she going to come OUT OF THE CLOSET already?

Comment by Thor — January 4, 2010 at 4:34 pm

MEMO TO AMERICAN WOMEN (some of these comments concern Kate Walsh, whoever she is):

1. Trout mouth is not “hot.”

2. An emaciated female frame is not “hot.” The willpower, denial, neuroses, and obsessions that compel a woman to become emaciated, and maintain her emaciated frame, are not “sexy.” If you are emaciated, I am confident you are an annoying high-maintenance head case who has bought into some gay male fashion designer’s fantasies concerning young men. You would not be a fun date.

3. An emaciated female frame with a 42DD fake rack is not “sexy.” Such a female has bought into a gay male fashion designer’s fantasies concerning young men and combined it with what she believes is a heterosexual male’s porn star fantasy. This female looks ridiculous and asymmetrical. She is not “hot.” I am confident she is also an annoying head case.

4. Intelligence is sexy. A sense of humor is sexy. Flirtation is sexy. Physical attractiveness, natural curves, and comfort with yourself are sexy.

Please stop buying into the American death culture’s vision concerning what’s allegedly “hot.”

Signed,

A generally appalled American male

Comment by 'Mela — January 4, 2010 at 5:58 pm

Her dress in pic #2 looks to be constricting breathing, as well as pushing her up and out!
I loved her red hair. It was so elegant. Bring it back, go up a size, and we’re good here…

Comment by Sarah — January 6, 2010 at 9:40 am

This woman has not had implants. She’s using Hollywood’s tricks to make her cleavage look bigger. The least you could do is compare two picture where she is wearing similar outfits. The second outfit it obviously more constricting and, therefore, providing her with cleavage.

Comment by ja — January 8, 2010 at 7:53 am

It doesn’t look like a boob job to me. Looks like those chicken cutlet bras that are squishing her boobs up.

Comment by somuchstupidity — January 8, 2010 at 1:19 pm

thanks thor. it’s nice to see that there are some americans with good taste too!!

Comment by lizzy — January 13, 2010 at 2:19 pm

Ditto Sarah – tops like that first one are complete boob-killlers and squishing them up gives her a cleavage.

Comment by DeeplySuperficial — January 15, 2010 at 10:03 am

Thor, an emaciated frame would not ever have a 42DD breast because the number has nothing to do with cupsize, but the measurement of the chest under the tittays.

So it would be more relatable to say maybe 32DDD. Which also, yes, is not hot.

C’mon. Kate Walsh isn’t in her 20s. Give her titties some friggin’ slack. They’re gonna be kinda lumpy and weird looking in something too tight over that area. It’s part of what sagging skin does. Take a look at those pictures of Jewel and her smashed boobies.

Bleck!

Comment by melony — February 5, 2010 at 11:48 am

Same tits, different woman?