Comments on: Amy Winehouse shows off her implants

By: Am

Am — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:28:21 +0000

ewww.

By: bryony1

bryony1 — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:06:48 +0000

Leave Amy Winehouse alone. She’s the only current singer who can really write her own music and sing it better than Beyonce. Amy IS the blues. If you haven’t heard her, do. Until then, keep quiet.

By: Anastasia

Anastasia — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:31:55 +0000

There was nothing every wrong, weird, or not beautiful with how she looked, the God given deal. I don’t understand it….all this surgery to just turn out being weird and ugly? SO strange to me, how so many people were gorgeous before the plastic surgery….then after….YIKES!!!!! It is really sad.

By: ausGeoff

ausGeoff — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:35:55 +0000

Can someone please enlighten me as to what Winehouse has actually done to justify all this speculation about her physical appearance? I must have missed her career when I was enjoying one of my 15-minute afternoon naps.
At any rate, I can only assume the respondents that have described her former incarnation as “pretty” or “beautiful” have her confused with somebody else.
Winehouse was neither, and is getting progressively worse.
Ironic too that my spell-checker is suggesting “whorehouse” as a replacement for Winehouse LOL.

By: Blackie

Blackie — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:14:12 +0000

Yeah, I suppose she’s going for the “tough chick” look w/ the tats & all…but it just makes her out to be a skank. The boobs do NOT complement the look! BTW, I don’t think that’s necessarily lanugo on her arms; she’s just Semitic (as am I) & we tend to have darker hair on our bodies.

By: lisa rossi

lisa rossi — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:03:01 +0000

It’s a walking Herpes virus

By: le

le — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:48:33 +0000

“Women are supposed to have soft, radiant, clear skin.” ^you know, attitudes like that is also what makes women have plastic surgery.

I think tattoos are hot, it’s a matter of preference. Here you are saying plastic surgery makes people look generic, but you are also saying people should look like a certain standard.

By: Liza

Liza — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:39:54 +0000

Nice hairy arms. Looks like a man. Jeez!

By: Boof

Boof — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:57:46 +0000

She looks so beautiful in the before pic. Curvy and soft. Healthy. Clean. Now she just looks hard and ragged. The tattoos looks dirty. I think tattoos always looks skanky on women. Women are supposed to have soft, radiant, clear skin. Not look like they have been assaulted by a grafitti artist. The “mole” is not a mole, it’s a piercing called a “Monroe” or “Madonna”. It’s called a Monroe if it’s on the left side, particularly, because it emulates the iconic mole of Marilyn Monroe, and if it’s on the right side it is called a Madonna, respectively. I have one, mine is on the left (Monroe). I am glad she did not “fix” her nose. She shouldn’t. It’s gives her character, and it makes her Amy. I think it’s beautiful. People are weird, they bash you for having an “imperfect” whatever, and then bash you when you fix it. A natural anything is better than a plastic anything, perfect or not. I wish my nose had more character like hers. I have a bone straight, tiny, sharp nose naturally, and everyone thinks it’s fake. It’s generic and I hate it. I wish she would clean up and go back to looking like she did in 2003. She is one of the only “artists” right now that actually has talent and substance, and I hate to see it go to waste. Her freckles are cute too, but I have to say the boibies are a no-no.

By: Amanda

Amanda — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:12:56 +0000

WOW she was sooooo pretty in 2003! What a shame