Comment by Suzy — March 20, 2009 at 6:12 am

Honestly…I think you’re stretching it here. She looks like she’s got on too much eyeliner on her upper lids, and maybe her face looks a bit rounder; perhaps she had too much to drink the night before? She’s got too much concealer on under her eyes, and it’s too pale, perhaps that’s what’s changing the look of her face, but to me, she just looks in this pic like she didn’t get enough sleep and troweled on the concealer to make up for it.

Comment by lola — March 20, 2009 at 11:52 am

What’s freaky about her face? She doesn’t look different at all, except that in the after photo, she doesn’t have under-eye circles.

Comment by a reader — March 20, 2009 at 12:00 pm

she has fans?

seriously though, her eyes look incredibly different. definitely had some work done.

Comment by TestT — March 20, 2009 at 12:57 pm

She looked like “herself” before -now, not so much. Generic, plastic… her face/cheecks are wayyy too puffy what is wrong with those people don’t they have mirrors or anyone in their lives with the guts to tell them no that’s a bad idea?

Comment by Len — March 20, 2009 at 7:37 pm

She is looking like Anne Heche around the eyes in the second pic

Comment by Goodeye — March 20, 2009 at 9:52 pm

Her nose looks smaller in the “after” pic, too.

Comment by Jay — March 21, 2009 at 11:09 am

What freaky face rolls?

Comment by tammy — March 21, 2009 at 5:25 pm

she looks do diffrent how old is she?

Comment by Matt — March 21, 2009 at 7:08 pm

She’s so Plain Jane ugly, if she hadn’t been born into Hollywood, she’d be an assistant manager at The Gap somewhere. She’s VERY lucky to have a career, because that face could never launch 1000 ships. Fugly with work done, fugly without, and an arrogant fugly personality to boot. And no, she has no fans.

Comment by Bambi — March 21, 2009 at 8:01 pm

She is either stoned, shouldn’t wear that black eye make-up or had some work done.

Comment by Tamiko — March 22, 2009 at 10:04 am

Not too bad, but she should stop for a while.

Comment by Madeline — March 23, 2009 at 12:16 am

The big difference I see in the two pics is that her eye makeup in the first is very smudgy. She also looks less tan in the second, but that could be because the photo is more exposed. Btw, say whatever you want about Madonna, but she has given birth (twice) so she is an actual human being not a robot, and is therefore a “who” not a “which” (but she can still be a b*tch).

Comment by Suzy — March 23, 2009 at 5:24 am

I think it’s a combination of too much black eyeliner and some over-light undereye concealer….and a bored smile

Comment by Gloria — March 23, 2009 at 2:03 pm

She looks a bit like Shannen Doherty in the second photo. Not a good role model either.

Comment by RoadCrossingChicken — March 24, 2009 at 7:23 pm

She used to look like her mother. Now, she looks like a thumb with eyes… no personality.

Comment by KarenSue — March 24, 2009 at 7:27 pm

She should try changing her personality before anymore plastic surgery.

Comment by Tommy — March 25, 2009 at 5:23 pm

I get the point her face looks frozen to me. Her eyelids are heavy and her eyes are slightly slanted and smaller. They’ve also lost a lot of expression and sparkle. It’s a pity because I liked her, I thought she was a great actress.

Comment by Ani — March 26, 2009 at 12:18 am

What a shame, a natural beauty..or was

Comment by lrm — March 26, 2009 at 4:45 pm

hmmm..i know people [women and men]who find her very beautiful. [well,this was several years ago,before she got freaky A La Madonna]…she has a grace and natural beauty. I dont think you could say fugly,perhaps plain jane,but in an au naturel way. And it’s true,being born into hollywood got her her start. I still think she’s a fine actress-wish she would focus on that and stay away from M.

Comment by Anonymous — March 27, 2009 at 4:09 am

Personally I think she doesn’t really look like there has been much done, and if it HAS been done, it’s very subtle and not as dramatic as stars who look NOTHING like their original selves (i.e. Courtney Love),

In my honest opinion, Gwenyth is stunning, BECAUSE she has this plain every-day woman look about her, she is NOT one of those BIG eyed beauties where every feature is perfectly proportionate, with the most flawless skin or the big massive beestung puffy lips. She’s a woman who has features that women can relate to because her looks are realistic and achievable, unlike the likes of Madonna, or Kim Kardashian, etc..

As for “Matt”, who thinks this woman is “fugly”, Iit’s somewhat hilariously funny how you accuse her of being an arrogant fugly personality when it’s ALL You’re showing here. Do you need that much attention that all you want to do is come onto forums and boards and comment about people you’ll never meet and never see because you’re jealous of their beauty or jealous that it’s someone you can never have? Grow up, for gods sake. You’re talking ilke an immature brat of a ten year old.

Comment by Xenia — March 27, 2009 at 12:13 pm

Fillers! She is starting to wear, but it won’t show for a while yet (say 5 years?). Then she will hit the wall hard, and become completely unrecognizable.

Comment by TF — March 27, 2009 at 8:31 pm

she looks better in the second picture

Comment by Lauren — March 28, 2009 at 5:14 am

She seems to be morphing into Anne Heche.

Comment by MG — March 28, 2009 at 8:23 am

Her eyes look different in the 2 photos. She is good looking, but not a beautiful. Attractive but no super hot. She was blessed with a show biz family and some good luck.

Comment by Jayce — March 28, 2009 at 4:46 pm

I Think she looks better..

Comment by CazFairy — March 30, 2009 at 4:50 am

Nothing to see here.

She might have had some Botox, but if so, very subtle – even her eyebrows are still identical to what we see in the first photo, and if there’s one give away with Botox it’s the eyebrow uplift (even when done well, there’s no avoiding the brow lift look!).

Comment by hermit crab — March 30, 2009 at 4:36 pm

she looks a little tired in the second picture, but otherwise the same. and WHEN did nasty become fashionable? that’s all i read on comment boards. nasty, nasty, nasty, as if all the posters are beautiful and wonderful people — likely not, or they wouldn’t be so nasty!!!

Comment by Monet — April 4, 2009 at 4:44 pm

She still looks good, classy as always because she doesn’t look like a porn star (which is the look that every female in hollywood is trying to achieve).

Comment by ray butler — April 11, 2009 at 10:32 am

She doesn’t look any different in those pictures. Different makeup, a few years apart. You’re aware that people change as they age, right?

Comment by Winona — April 22, 2009 at 12:07 pm

I honestly don’t think she looks that different in the second picture. I think she’s aging well. I would not have guessed that she’s had any work done from the first picture to the second. Matt’s comments were a little harsh, but I have to agree that she’s plain — though certainly not ugly, much less fugly, IMO — and has been wildly overhyped as a beauty and an actress. I think that people resent her not so much because they’re jealous, but because she’s overyhped and it’s hard to image she would have had a career if not for her family connections.

Comment by Noora — May 7, 2009 at 3:48 am

To be honest I think she looks much better. I think she looked a little hard and butch before. Definately better now.

Comment by laksldfj — May 26, 2009 at 9:36 am

wtf, she’s so young why did she do this to herself? she looks scary. she destroyed her face

Comment by Lanny — June 2, 2009 at 6:09 pm

It simply appears as though shes had a chemical peel, not surgery

Comment by billie — June 18, 2009 at 8:56 am

I honestly think she doesn’t look much different, nor does she look bad.
It’s very easy to assume someone has had plastic surgery based on 2 pictures where different makeup/ lighting/angle has been used. If you took 2 pictures of me on 2 days I guess you could easily find significant differences and then pretend I’ve had surgery. It’s one think to point at ridiculous surgery, it’s another to make up stories.
Gwyneth looks decent to me.

Comment by BETH — July 1, 2009 at 9:52 pm

She looks the same to me, except that she’s wearing less makeup in the second photo.

Comment by James — July 21, 2009 at 10:19 am

I think she had a mini facelift OR lower eyelid surgery. or both.

Comment by melanie moo — July 27, 2009 at 5:34 pm

She has had her nose, eyes, chin done. Also, she wears colored contacts. She is really resembling Kelly Ripa. Oh and she has had her lips injected.

Comment by bast — August 3, 2009 at 2:22 pm

my goodness, mini or more like a younger but larger Madonna- the photo looks good, but this new look, where in the world did G Paltrow go, she’s gone-

Comment by Francesca — October 19, 2009 at 5:53 pm

Uh, how does she look different? I think her friendship with madonna is what’s odd, actually.