Yup, its the Teri Hatcher edition
Lose Weight: Liquid Hoodia | Alli Fat Blocker | Caralluma | Acai Berries
previous post: What’s wrong with Clint Eastwood’s face? -- next post: Vida Guerra’s bolted on boobs
Filed under: Teri Hatcher by thestaff
Many readers write in about Teri Hatcher of Desperate Housewives fame. Complaints range from, ‘her face looks frozen’ to ‘her nostrils are very uneven’. (Nostrils can be uneven after rhinoplasty surgery.) Anyway, I think she looks like she has had a face lift. When she resurfaced on Desperate Housewives, I never remembered her looking that hard. She looked like she had hit the wall (literally).
Check out how she looked in the 90s compared to now. Her eyes are different and her face seems to have lost softness (probably from fat loss).

This entry was posted on Saturday, November 8th, 2008 at 10:37 pm and is filed under the categories Teri Hatcher with the tags . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
| Comment by kt — November 9, 2008 at 10:45 am At least she hasn’t done her lips. |
| Comment by mytwocents — November 9, 2008 at 1:23 pm Compared to most celebrities today, Hatcher doesn’t look so bad. In fact, she looks more like herself, than most do. Of course she’s going to look different now compared to the 90’s. It’s called aging. |
| Comment by IKnowAll — November 9, 2008 at 2:19 pm She may be the only actress in Hollywood whose lips are actually thinner now. Those cheeks look fishy, too. |
| Comment by frewt — November 9, 2008 at 4:54 pm Not convinced about the face lift - she’s only in her early 40’s. I think she may have had her upper eyelids done though and she certainly uses botox but who doesn’t these days? |
| Comment by Emmanuelle Brunet — November 9, 2008 at 5:05 pm What about her boobs that suddenly grew in the midsts of last season (they even joked about it in an episode, saying it was the effect of her pregnancy of Mike’s baby)? |
| Comment by BeauSaxon — November 9, 2008 at 9:13 pm Well, at least she hasn’t destroyed her lips with collagen or fillers, like the rest of Hollywood has. They look pretty much the same. |
| Comment by Manifan — November 9, 2008 at 9:31 pm It looks to me like she’s had the bags removed from under her eyes. While watching her this season on DH it took me awhile to figure out why she looks younger than she did last year. |
| Comment by Suzanne — November 9, 2008 at 10:57 pm OH please, Teri. just admit it once and for all. Your breasts are not “real and spectacular” and they never were and your face. has been redone as well. Give it up. Who cares but you? You live and work in Hollywood and everyone there has an enourmous amout of work done. Yours looks pretty good, all in all. Just admit it and everyone will love you more for it. |
| Comment by CATHAZAT — November 9, 2008 at 11:03 pm When are these Hollywood in their 40s going to learn that aging + too thin + plastic surgery = TRANNY! I find it ironic, as a slightly endowed woman herself, that some would then go in an “plump up” certain facial features. Just EAT SOMETHING! Embrace your curves! Lose the trout pouts! Oy Vay! |
| Comment by Renee — November 10, 2008 at 8:33 pm Here she is from her Superman days, I dont think she looks any different, which is amazing since that was 15 years ago |
| Comment by Julie — November 11, 2008 at 2:20 pm She has definitely had surgical work done to her face. I remember when Lois & Clark first aired thinking that she was so, so pretty, but at the end of its run in 97 how quickly she had aged. Some people just don’t have great-ageing skin. That was over 10 years ago and now she looks older but in that unnatural, trying-to-hold-the-years-back artificial way. She is very thin with little fat in her face, yet her skin is not sagging at all compared to 15 years ago. Her upper eyes have a strange, hollowed look. I know she is not the only one to get cosmetic work on DW, but she is the only one who makes me cringe whenever she comes on the air because of how strange she looks (Nicolette Sheridan a far second). |
| Comment by gez — November 11, 2008 at 7:44 pm Maybe she has had work done, but as twocents pointed out, aging has a lot to do with the changes in her face just as it does with everyone else’s face. Many times on this site the pictures that are shown are 10 - 15 years apart. Of course they are going to look better when they were younger. Facial features change - noses grow and sag, lips and cheeks, thin out, etc. etc. There isn’t necessarily a cosmetic procedure behind the change. |
| Comment by jonathan — November 12, 2008 at 12:12 pm I’d get killed if I were to share the files, but my friend is a big hollywood retoucher. BIG TIME. Anyway, I have the files from a covershoot she did 2 years ago and there was quite a bit of normal touch up work to make it cover-worthy. To see the before shots really tells you that she hasn’t had as much work as people are claiming and that her face in real life isn’t as scary. I think she looks great in person but I’m sure no one will believe me anyway. But I love this site! |
| Comment by Suzanne — November 17, 2008 at 9:06 pm At least her lips aren’t pumped full of Restylane. But yeah, Botox’d out. |
| Comment by GW — November 19, 2008 at 5:58 am Her face reminds me a little bit of Cindy Crawford’s face. Both their faces hardened and became more masculine over the years. They also have weird, deep sunken eyes. |
Leave a comment:












